A common method to justify immoral behavior

What do you think about justifying immoral behavior? Be honest with yourself and think about what methods have you used to justify your immoral behavior?

Most of us like to believe that we are morally correct and well know the right and wrong ... but when we are tempted to violate ethics to achieve personal interests, we usually do not choose the right way.

In many cases, in the psychological process , immorality is considered ethical behavior and self -esteem. Researchers justify this process selfishly ...

Sometimes the purpose of justifying immoral behavior is to do the desired desire before realizing it, and sometimes justifying people helps people not feel guilty after doing the job ...

Here are three conventional strategies that people use to justify their immoral behavior and maintain a positive view:

1) Justification for Behavior in the Gray Area

One way to be safe from the sense of criminals is to provide a vague ethical definition of behavior rather than public confession ... Some conditions are really complicated or confusing ...

, for example, contradictory advice on public health can be ambiguous, but in some cases it can be strategically used by the people. It was to dice one or three times and mention the first launch to receive the equivalent of the prize. The results showed that participants who thrown dice several times reported more than those who once reported Dice ...

, for example, 34 % of those who have dice several times reported number 6. The participants probably thought to themselves to lie about the first dice number (even if it appears in the next round) it is easier to lie down on a number that never appeared..

1) Believe that this behavior is in favor of others

Many people call their humanitarian immoral behavior justified instead of personal interests.

1) Highlight Ethics Looks less in accordance with their moral values, just when a person reflects on their ethics elsewhere and elsewhere ...

The thinking of these people is reluctant to do a competent act to overlook his other behavior .... It seems a good thing to tick the option and can continue to do other behaviors ...

Based on a set of research, participants who focused on individual superiority and positive qualities such as generosity, justice and kindness were less contributed to charity than those who thought of negative characteristics or neutral words ...

In the hypothetical scenario, the workplace was less important for this ethics, probably because they proved less than their moral position after they thought of their positive qualities ...

In another study, participants, after purchasing an environmental product, have purchased a promotional product in a computer game than those who have received a cash prize ...

The main thing is not that thinking about positive traits or environmental protection will lead to ethics, but people feel that the good things they have done in the past will cause them to bypass ethics in other conditions ...

Therefore, the moral permission of the sword is a double sword: when one's moral identity is threatened and feels that it has to reinforce it, it encourages moral behavior in the short term, but on the other hand it is not a sustainable source of long -term ethical behavior.

1) Symbol cleansing

Research shows that after violating ethics, people do real or symbolic sins to wash their sins. At the end of the session, two cases were considered as a gift: Pencil and wipes ...

Subsequent research showed that cleaning of detergent after reminding of sin has made participants less sinful, shame and scandal ... so they were half voluntary to participate in another study ....

Although clearing is psychologically beneficial ... but it does not necessarily have social benefits ... Similar results show that this motivation reduces motivation instead of increasing the likelihood of one's efforts to improve or take advantage in the future.

1) Half and Half Half

Confession to a mistake is a constructive step in the sliding process ... but sometimes people just go to part instead of accepting responsibility for all their mistakes.

Research shows that half and half of the confessions can be used to restore one's moral impression. This at the same time allows the person to prevent the negative consequences of complete confession. For example, the researchers point to the university principal who, especially to applicants who lie about their degree, was at the time that he exaggerated his documents. Other examples include politicians who emphasize some types of crime ...

Research on ethical distances has shown that this situation is increasing in certain circumstances ... First, the good behavior of immoral behavior must be taken into account.. In short, we usually conflict between the desire to see ourselves and see a good man and the desire to act in a path that does not necessarily match this concept ...

but as long as the desire to be ethical is more than the actual action to be honest, it seems unlikely that these selfish stimuli are self -motivated and self -motivated.

[SIBWP_FORM ID = 1]

Guide Psychiatrist and Psychiatrist can provide useful information about reasons for justifying immoral behavior ...

GCORP LLC Team is trying to get your loved ones simply and as soon as possible. Was it?